Classification of vulnerability in the care of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury in older adults

Authors

Keywords:

traumatic spinal cord injury; predictive tool; prognosis; quality of life; discriminant analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI) causes significant disability and cost, making classification models an important tool for guiding therapy and optimizing resource allocation.

Objective: To classify adults with TCSCI by discharge status: deceased, recovered, or disabled.

Method: A retrospective, analytical, longitudinal study was conducted in Camagüey from 2019 to 2023, involving 84 patients. After applying exclusion criteria, multiple discriminant analysis (successive steps) was used on clinical, neurological, and morbidity variables to obtain Fisher's linear functions, which were validated using confounding matrices.

Results: The variables that differed significantly (p ≤ 0.005) in the discriminant analysis were age, fracture-dislocation, spinal shock, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, muscle strength 0-1, and ASIA A-B score. An overall accuracy of 81% was obtained for the discriminant function. Of these, 66.7% died, 84.8% recovered, and 68.9% were left disabled (Wilks' Lambda = 0.342; p < 0.001). The combination enabled risk stratification with reasonable accuracy and identified these variables as predictors of vulnerability and mortality.

Conclusions: The model classified the injured according to their condition at discharge and anticipated clinical evolution, and enabled personalized therapeutic interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Liu J, Liu HW, Gao F, Li J, Li JJ. Epidemiological features of traumatic spinal cord injury in Beijing, China. J Spinal Cord Med[Internet].2022[citado 2Jun 2025];45(2): 214-220 Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1793505

2. Lu Y, Shang Z, Zhang W, Pang M, Hu X, Dai Y et al .Global incidence and characteristics of spinal cord since 2000- 2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med[Internet]. 2024 [citado 2 Jun 2025];22:285 Disponible en: https://doi.org/s12916-024-03514-9

3. Fernández Londoño LL, Marchesini N, Espejo Ballesteros D, Álzate García L,Gómez Jiménez JA, Ginalis E et al. Epidemiological review of spinal cord injury due to road traffic accidents in Latin America. MedPrincPract[Internet]. 2022[citado 2Jun 2025];31:11–19 Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8995633/pdf/mpp-0031-0011.pdf

4. Barbiellini Amidei C, Salmaso L, Bellio S, Saia M. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: a large population-based study. Spinal Cord [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 7];60(9):812–9. Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-022-00795-w

5. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud. Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2023[Internet].La Habana: Ministerio de Salud Pública; 2024 [citado 15 May 2021]. Disponible en: https://files.sld.cu/dne/files/2024/09/Anuario-Estadístico-de-Salud-2023-EDICION-2024.pdf

6. Rupp R, Biering-Sørensen F, Burns SP, Graves DE, Guest J, Jones L, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord InjRehabil[Internet]. 2021 [citado 2 Ene 2025];27(2):[aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8152171/

7. Schroeder GD, Canseco JA, Patel PD, Divi SN, Karamian BA, Kandziora F, et al. Establishing the injury severity of subaxial cervical spine trauma: Validating the hierarchical nature of the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical SpineInjury Classification System. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2020 Dec [citado 20 May 2022];46(10):[aprox. 7 p.]. Disponible en:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8057527/

8. Mahanes D, Muehlschlegel S, Wartenberg KE, Rajajee V, Alexander SA, Busl KM et al. Guidelines for neuroprognostication in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurocrit Care [Internet]. 2024[citado 12 Mar 2025];40(2):[aprox. 12 p.].Disponible en:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12028-023-01845-8

9. Closas AH, Arriola EA, Amarilla MR, Jovanovich EC. Modelización del rendimiento matemático mediante análisis discriminante. Epsilon- Rev Educación matemática. [Internet]. 2025 [citado el 7 de jul de 2025];119:7-19 Disponible en: https://www.saemthales.es/epsilon/sites/default/files/2025-05/epsilon119_01.pdf

10. Fallah N, Noonan V, Waheed Z, et al. Development of a machine learning algorithm for predicting in-hospital and one-year mortality after traumatic spinal cord injury: Mortality prediction tool for spinal cord injury. Spine J. [Internet]. 2021[citado el 7 de jul de 2025];21(5):732-741. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.08.003

11. Mosquera-Betancourt G. Envejecimiento fisiológico y predisposición al trauma craneoencefálico. ArchMéd Camagüey [Internet]. 2011 [citado 25 Dic 2022];15(5):[aprox.7 p.]. Disponible en: https://revistaamc.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/280

12. Betharte-Sotomayor Y, Santana-Díaz A, Mosquera-Betancourt G. Factores de mal pronóstico en pacientes geriátricos con lesión medular traumática. ArchmédCamagüey [Internet]. 2022 [citado 12 Dic 2022]; 26 Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-02552022000100076&lng=es

13. Richard-Denis A, Feldman D, Thompson C, Mac-Thiong JM. Prediction of functional recovery six months following traumatic spinal cord injury during acute care hospitalization. J Spinal Cord Med. [Internet]2018[citado 12 Dic 2022];41(3):309-317. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2017.1279818

14. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR, Kwon BK, Burns AS, Martin AR, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of acute spinal cord injury: Introduction, rationale, and scope. Global Spine J [Internet]. 2017 [citado 26 Jun 2022];7(3Suppl):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/signup.SignUp.html?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19

15. Jazayeri SB, Maroufi SF, Mohammadi E, DabbaghOhadi MA, Hagen E-M, Chalangari M, et al. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: A systematic review, data integration, and update. WorldNeurosurg X [Internet]. 2023[citado 2Jun 2025];1:100171. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100171

16. Colnaric JM, El Sibai RH, Bachir RH, El Sayed MJ. Injury severity score as a predictor of mortality in adult trauma patients by injury mechanism types in the United States: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2022[citado 2 Jun 2025];101(28):e29614. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000029614

17. Li H, Ma Y-F. New injury severity score (NISS) outperforms injury severity score (ISS) in the evaluation of severe blunt trauma patients. Chin J Traumatol [Internet]. 2021[citado 2 Jun 2025];24(5):261–5. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.01.006

18. Rodríguez Alonso A, Oltra Rodríguez E. Características clínicas, complicaciones secundarias y apoyos en personas con lesión medular traumática en Asturias. Enfermglob [Internet]. 2020 [citado 25 Nov2022];19(4):[aprox. 10 p.]. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/eg/v19n60/1695-6141-eg-19-60-322.pdf

19. Hicks KE, Zhao Y, Fallah N, et al. A simplified clinical prediction rule for prognosticating independent walking after spinal cord injury: a prospective study from a Canadian multicenter spinal cord injury registry. Spine J. [Internet]. 2017[citado 25 Nov 2025];17(10):1383-92. Disponible en:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.03

20. Castro Marzán R, Pérez Pérez E, Larrea Fabra ME. Aplicación de escalas pronósticas en lesiones traumáticas para ingresado(as) en terapia intensiva. ArchHospUnivGen Calixto García” [Internet].2022 [citado 3 de noviembre de 2025];10(2): [aprox. 10 p.]. Disponible en: https://revcalixto.sld.cu/index.php/ahcg/article/view/e941

21. Tan X, Wu Y, Li F, Wei Q, Lu X et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for hypoproteinemia after traumatic spinal cord injury. A multicenter retrospectiveclinicalstudy. Medicine [Internet]. 2024[citado 25 Nov 2025];103:25 Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038081

22. Malekzadeh H, Golpayegani M, Ghodsi Z, Sadeghi-Naini M, Asgardoon M, Baigi V, Vaccaro AR, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Direct Cost of Illness for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J [Internet].2022 Jul [citado 25 Nov 2025];12(6):1267-1281. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211031190

23. Huang H, Young W, Skaper S, Chen L, Moviglia G. et al. Clinical Neurorestorative Therapeutic Guidelines for Spinal Cord Injury (IANR/CANR version 2019) Journal of Orthopaedic Translation [Internet].2019 Nov 11 [citado 20 May 2022];20:[aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en :https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6939117/

Published

2026-10-03

How to Cite

1.
Betharte Sotomayor Y, Serra Reyes D, Mosquera Betancourt G, Navarro Ruiz A. Classification of vulnerability in the care of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury in older adults. Rev Cubana Inv Bioméd [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 3 [cited 2026 Oct. 4];45:e4040. Available from: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/4040

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.