Challenges in thesis supervision in health sciences programs
Keywords:
university, academic thesis, supervision, satisfaction, thesis, health sciences.Abstract
Introduction: The thesis constitutes a scientific activity to obtain academic degrees and professional titles in the university system. It demonstrates the capacity to innovate and the acquired research competencies.
Objective: To summarize the main challenges encountered in the supervision of theses related to university programs in the health sciences.
Methods: A literature review study was designed. Original articles were explored in the databases Scopus, PubMed, ERIC, SciELO, Redalyc and the Google Scholar search engine. Texts developed in any health sciences program that had considered the thesis supervision process were included.
Results: Ten original articles were included. Seven had a qualitative approach. Challenges and characteristics of the thesis supervision process were identified. Shortage of tutors, lack of student time and timely support were among the main challenges. It was felt that intensive guidance, tutor collaboration, and confidence in the student's abilities would facilitate the revision process.
Conclusions: The challenges encountered relate to the tutor, the thesis candidate and the institution. With respect to the supervisor, the failure in communication skills to link with the student, the lack of preparation in research competencies and expertise to correct an academic work are pointed out. The lack of motivation diminishes the student's efforts to complete the thesis. The dissatisfaction with the revision and the lack of understanding do not allow establishing an appropriate relationship between the student and the tutor. Added to this is the inadequate research climate and the absence of norms to regulate the supervisor's functions.
Downloads
References
1. Dehghani GH, Douzi MY. Students' satisfaction and related factors of thesis process in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Stride Dev Med Educ. 2009 [acceso 13/12/2022];6(1):1-9. Disponible en: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33492075.pdf
2. Castro-Rodríguez Y, Lara-Verástegui R. Experiencias y percepciones de los graduados de Odontología sobre la culminación de la tesis en una universidad del Perú. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2021;24(3):235-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/os.v24i3.20715
3. Castro-Rodríguez Y. Desarrollo de competencias investigativas en estudiantes de las Ciencias de la Salud. Sistematización de experiencias. Duazary. 2020;17(4):65-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.3602
4. Drennan J, Clarke M. Coursework master’s programmes: the student’s experience of research and research supervision. Stud High Educ. 2009;34(5):483-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597150
5. Komba SC. Challenges of writing theses and dissertations among postgraduate students in Tanzanian Higher Learning Institutions. Int J Res Est Educ. 2015;5(3):71-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1280
6. Matin MA, Khan MA. Common problems faced by postgraduate students during their thesis works in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Med Educ. 2017;8(1):22-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjme.v8i1.32245
7. Colvin JW, Ashman M. Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentor Tutoring Partnersh Learn. 2010;18(2):121-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678879
8. Hu Y, Huang Y, Ding J, Liu Y, Fan D, Li T, et al. Status of clinical research in China. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):124-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60017-2
9. Ibrahim A. Directive, collaborative, or non-directive? Thesis supervision approaches in the United Arab Emirates. Issues Educ Res. 2018 [acceso 13/12/2022];28(3):679-700. Disponible en: http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/ibrahim.pdf
10. Aldosari DM, Ibrahim AS. The relationship between interpersonal approaches of thesis supervisors and graduate student satisfaction. Int Educ Stud. 2019;12(10):96-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p96
11. Pilcher N. The UK postgraduate Masters dissertation: an ‘elusive chameleon’? Teach High Educ. 2011;16(1):29-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.530752
12. Donnelly R, Fitzmaurice M. Resource Pack on Supervising Postgraduate Students. 2017 [acceso 13/12/2022]. Disponible en: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/ltcoth/52/
13. Castro-Rodríguez Y, Lara-Verástegui R. Percepciones de los estudiantes de Odontología sobre el desempeño de la docencia clínica Rev Cub Inv Bioméd. 2021 [acceso 13/12/2022];40(1):e935. Disponible en: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/935/860
14. Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage; 2012.
15. Randolph JJ. A Guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2009;14(13):1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/b0az-8t74
16. Öcek Z, Batı H, Sezer ED, Köroğlu ÖA, Yılmaz Ö, Yılmaz ND, et al. Research training program in a Turkish medical school: challenges, barriers and opportunities from the perspectives of the students and faculty members. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02454-1
17. Castro-Rodríguez Y. Relación entre enfoque de supervisión y satisfacción de la tesis universitaria en Odontología. Odovtos Inte J Dent Sci. 2022;24(2):34-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/IJDS.2021.46377
18. Kordestani A, Esmaillzadeh A, Azadbakht L. Postgraduate Research Mentorship Program: An approach to improve the quality of postgraduate research supervision and mentorship in Iranian students. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_37_19
19. Bazrafkan L, Yousefy A, Amini M, Yamani N. The journey of thesis supervisors from novice to expert: a grounded theory study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1739-z
20. Abhari S, Monem H, Garavand A, Bastani P, Rezaee R. Designing a thesis tele-supervision system for postgraduate medical sciences students. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019;7(4):191-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.74926
21. Skeith L, Ridinger H, Srinivasan S, Givi B, Youssef N, Harris I. Exploring the thesis experience of Master of Health professions education graduates: a qualitative study. Int J Med Educ. 2018;9:113-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5abe.2209
22. Beaudin A, Emami E, Palumbo M, Tran SD. Quality of supervision: postgraduate dental research trainees' perspectives. Eur J Dent Educ. 2016;20(1):32-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12137
23. Yousefi A, Bazrafkan L, Yamani N. A qualitative inquiry into the challenges and complexities of research supervision: viewpoints of postgraduate students and faculty members. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015 [acceso 13/12/2022];3(3):91-8. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26269785/
24. Caldwell PH, Oldmeadow W, Jones CA. Supervisory needs of research doctoral students in a university teaching hospital setting. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(10):907-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02522.x
25. Evans C, Stevenson K. The learning experiences of international doctoral students with particular reference to nursing students: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(2):239-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.025
26. Zaheer M, Munir S. Research supervision in distance learning: issues and challenges. Asian Assoc Open Univ J. 2020;15(1):131-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2020-0003
27. Costa K. A systematic review of challenges in research supervision at south african universities. Preprints. 2018:2018120305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201812.0305.v1
28. Hazavehei MM, Sh E. The KAP study of faculty members of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences about academic advising programs in 1998. J Res Health Sci. 2001 [acceso 13/12/2022];7(4):36-43. Disponible en: https://www.sid.ir/paper/17950/en
29. Wood L, Louw I. Reconsidering postgraduate supervision from a participatory action learning and action research approach. South African J High Educ. 2018;32(4):284-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/32-4-2562
30. Armstrong SJ. The impact of supervisors' cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in management education. Br J Educ Psychol. 2004;74(4):599-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/0007099042376436
31. Changiz T, Adibi P, Hosseini M, Tootoonchi M. Viewpoints of supervisors about the problems in the process of dissertations for General Medicine Program Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2003 [acceso 13/12/2022];3(1):23-33. Disponible en: https://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-175-en.html
32. Donaldson SI, Grant-Vallone EJ. Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. J Bus Psychol. 2002;17(2):245-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019637632584
33. Subramanian J, Anderson VR, Morgaine KC, Thomson WM. Effective and ineffective supervision in postgraduate dental education: a qualitative study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013;17(1):e142-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00774.x
34. González-García S, Casadelvalle I, Urda-Bordoy MO, Yedra A, Fortum ST, Mezquia N. La COVID-19 y la formación científica de los estudiantes de medicina. Rev Cub Inv Bioméd. 2021 [acceso 13/12/2022];40(1):e943. Disponible en: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/943/863
35. Baltzersen RK. The importance of meta communication in supervision processes in higher education. Int J High Educ. 2013;2(2):128-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p128
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes: Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Como Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas forma parte de la red SciELO, una vez los artículos sean aceptados para entrar al proceso editorial (revisión), estos pueden ser depositados por parte de los autores, si estan de acuerdo, en SciELO preprints, siendo actualizados por los autores al concluir el proceso de revisión y las pruebas de maquetación.
