Influence of NeuroEPO on the fetal pancreas of rats with placental insufficiency

Authors

Keywords:

Páncreas; insuficiencia placentaria; eritropoyetina

Abstract

Introduction: placental insufficiency is the most common cause of intrauterine growth retardation. In the fetus with IUGR, hypoxia and malnutrition can cause alterations in pancreatic development. It is known that NeuroEPO, due to its therapeutic properties, protects tissues under hypoxic conditions. 

Objectives: to evaluate the influence of human erythropoietin with low sialic acid content (NeuroEPO) on the fetal pancreas of rats in a model of placental insufficiency. 

Method: pregnant Wistar rats underwent ligation of the right uterine artery on day 16 of gestation. On the same day, half of the rats received NeuroEPO (0.5 mg/kg/day subcutaneously for three days) and the rest received a placebo. On day 20 of gestation, the offspring were divided into four groups based on the uterine horn in which they were located: a Control group (n=35), an IUGR group (n=20), a Control NeuroEPO group (n=38), and an IUGR NeuroEPO group (n=24). Fetuses and their placentas were weighed. Fetal length and cranial diameters were measured. A random sample of 5 fetal pancreases per group was taken. Histological variables were studied in this organ using haematoxylin-eosin and Gomori staining. 

Results: fetuses with IUGR exhibited decreased body weight, and their placentas were less efficient. In the pancreas, a reduction in the density of the islets of Langerhans and beta cells was observed. In the IUGR group treated with NeuroEPO, these variables were similar to those in the control group. 

Conclusions: administration of this molecule improved fetal weight and promoted proper pancreatic development, possibly due to its cytoprotective effects. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nínive Lopez Núñez, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana. Facultad ICBP “Victoria de Girón”

Profesor del Departamento de Embriología

References

1.Zur RL, Kingdom JC, Parks WT, Hobson SR. The Placental Basis of Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;47(1):81-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PMID: 32008673.

2.Acevedo I, Soria DA, Tomat A, Elesgaray R, Arranz C, Caniffi C. Intrauterine Programming of Adult Disease: Identification of Cardinal Genes Associated with Hypertension, Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Rev. argent. cardiol. [Internet]. 2021 Mar [citado 2025 Abr 9] ; 89( 1 ): 27-36. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-37482021000100027&lng=es. Epub 01-Mar-2021. https://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v89.i1.19666.

3. Asahara SI, Inoue H, Kido Y. Regulation of Pancreatic β-Cell Mass by Gene-Environment Interaction. Diabetes & metabolism journal [Internet]. 2022 fecha de acceso:17/4/23 PMC8831821]; 46(1):[38-48 pp.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831821/.

4. Bruin C, Damhuis S, Gordijn S, Ganzevoort W. Evaluation and Management of Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America. 2021. 48(2), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2021.02.007

5. Fetal Growth Restriction: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 227. Obstetrics & Gynecology 137(2):p e16-e28, February 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004251

6.Bhoopalan SV, Huang LJ, Weiss MJ. Erythropoietin regulation of red blood cell production: from bench to bedside and back. F1000Res. 2020 Sep 18;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-1153. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26648.1. PMID: 32983414; PMCID: PMC7503180.

7. OorschotDE, Sizemore RJ, AmerAR. Treatment of Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy with Erythropoietin Alone, and Erythropoietin Combined with Hypothermia: History, Current Status, and Future Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041487

8.Maltaneri RE. Mecanismos de acción de eritropoyetina y eritropoyetina carbamilada en la funcionalidad de células endoteliales.Tesis doctoralUniversidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Argentina , 2018 https://hdlhandlenet/2050012110/tesis_n6372_Maltaneri.

9.Suresh S, Rajvanshi PK, Noguchi CT. The many facets of erythropoietin physiologic and metabolic response. Frontiers in physiology. 2020;10:497186.Doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01534.

10. Suárez K, Fernández G, Y. R. Eritropoyetina en la neuroprotección y su entrada al sistema nervioso a través de la cavidad nasal. Investigaciones Medicoquirúrgicas 2020 [Internet]. https://revcimeq.sld.cu/index.php/imq/article/view/588.

11. Zhang, J., Zhao, D., Na, N., Li, H., Miao, B., Hong, L., Huang, Z."Renoprotective effect of erythropoietin via modulation of the STAT6/MAPK/NF-κB pathway in ischemia/reperfusion injury after renal transplantation". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 2018. 41 (1): 25-32. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2017.3204

12. Ji YQ, Zhang YQ, Li MQ, Du MR, Wei WW, Li DJ. EPO improves the proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of trophoblast and decidual stromal cells through activating STAT-5 and inactivating p38 signal in human early pregnancy. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4(8):765-74. Epub 2011 Nov 3. PMID: 22135724; PMCID: PMC3225788.

13.Muñoz A, García JC, Pardo Z, Sosa I. Formulaciones nasales de EPORH con bajo contenido de ácido siálico para el tratamiento de enfermedades del sistema nervioso. Patente. Número de publicación internacional WO 2007/009404 A1.2009.

14.Fernández Romero T, Clapés Hernández S, Pérez CL, Núñez López N, Suárez Román G, Fernández G. Protective effect of NeuroEPO in the reproduction of diabetic rats. Rev haban cienc méd [Internet] 2022 [citado08/08/2022];Disponible en: http://wwwrevhabanerasldu/indexphp/rhab/article/view/4797.

15. Janot M, Cortes-Dubly ML, Rodriguez S, Huynh-Do U. Bilateral uterine vessel ligation as a model of intrauterine growth restriction in mice. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Jul 8;12:62.https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-62

16. Jabary, M., Onoda, A., Kitase, Y. et al. Fetal growth restriction followed by early catch-up growth impairs pancreatic islet morphology in male rats. Sci Rep ..13, 2732 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28584-2

17. Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2020.18(7): e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410.

18. Badawoud MH, Abdel-Aziz G, El-Fark MM, et al. The Effect of Aluminum Exposure on Maternal Health and Fetal Growth in Rats. Cureus. 2022.14(11): e31775. DOI 10.7759/cureus.31775

19. MoriokaF, Tani N, Ikeda T, et al. Morphological and biochemical changes in the pancreas associated with acute systemic hypoxia. Human Cell. 2021. 34, 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-020-00481-0

20. Meher S, Duley L, Hunter K, Askie L. Antiplatelet gestation for preventing preeclampsia: therapy before or after 16 weeks an individual participant data meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:121-8.e2.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.016

21. Conei D, Cáceres Gutiérrez D, Haverbeck M, Fierro R, Veuthey C, del Sol M, et al. Efectos de la Aspirina en Fetos de Rata con Reducción de la Presión de la Perfusión Uterina. Int. J. Morphol. [Internet]. 2019 Jun [citado 2023 Mar20];37(2):739-743.Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/ijmorphol/v37n2/0717-9502-ijmorphol-37-02-00739.pdf

22.Bettiol A, Avagliano L, Lombardi N, Crescioli G, Emmi G, Urban ML, Virgili, et al. Pharmacological Interventions for the Prevention of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 110: 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2164

23. Colson A, Sonveaux P, Debiève F, N Sferruzzi-Perri A. Adaptations of the human placenta to hypoxia: opportunities for interventions in fetal growth restriction. Human Reproduction Update. 2021; (27);3 pp. 531–569. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmaa053

24. Sun C, Groom KM, Oyston C, Chamley LW, Clark AR, James JL. The placenta in fetal growth restriction: What is going wrong?. Placenta. 2020;96:10-18. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2020.05.003

25.Zhang L, Chen W, Dai Y, Zhu Z, Liu Q. Detection of expressional changes induced by intrauterine growth restriction in the developing rat pancreas. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2016;241(13):1446-1456. doi:10.1177/1535370216638771

26. Wendt Zhu L TA, Lemes RM, Oliveira CJ, Almeida Ada S, Chica JE. Data on morphometric analysis of the pancreatic islets from C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. Data in brief. 2016;(8):1094-8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.07.030.

27. Caicedo A, Huising MO, Wess J. An Intraislet Paracrine Signaling Pathway That Enables Glucagon to Stimulate Pancreatic β-Cells. Diabetes. 2023 Dec 1;72(12):1748-1750. doi: 10.2337/dbi23-0023.

28.Shuai H, Zhang J, Zhang J, Xie J, Zhang M, Yu Y, et al. Erythropoietin protects pancreatic β-cell line NIT-1 cells against cytokine-induced apoptosis via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling. Endocrine research. 2011;36(1):25-34.https://doi.org/10.3109/07435800.2010.534753

29.Menger MM, Nalbach L, Roma LP, et al. Erythropoietin accelerates the revascularization of transplanted pancreatic islets. Br J Pharmacol. 2020; 177: 1651–1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14925

30. Yin W, Noguchi CT. The Role of Erythropoietin in Metabolic Regulation. Cells. 2025; 14(4):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14040280.

31. Fernández Romero T, Clapés Hernández S, Pérez Hernández CL, Barreto López JJ, Fernández Peña G. Efecto hipoglicemiante de la NeuroEPO en ratas con y sin diabetes mellitus. Rev habanera cienc méd. 2022;21(1).

Published

2026-03-03

How to Cite

1.
Mora Peña M, Cruz Álvarez Y, Núñez NL, Pardo Rodríguez M, Llanes Tamayo A, Diaz Nuviola L. Influence of NeuroEPO on the fetal pancreas of rats with placental insufficiency. Rev Cubana Inv Bioméd [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 3 [cited 2026 Mar. 5];45:e4059. Available from: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/4059

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES