Performance of resin composite restorations placed in high caries risk children: a clinical retrospective study

Authors

Keywords:

adhesive restoration, Primary teeth, survival analysis

Abstract

Background: Resin composite has been usually used for restoring primary teeth. Nevertheless, there is a lack of supporting clinical data regarding the survival of resin composite restorations and risk factors that may dictate the service time of the treatment in children.

Aim: to evaluated the survival and factors associated with composite resin restoration failure in high caries risk children treated under risk-factor management clinical protocol for dental caries prior to restorative therapy. 

Design: A total of 230 restorations in primary teeth from records of 48 were included in the study. Restoration longevity, up to 3-year follow-up, was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with shared frailty was used to evaluate the factors associated with failures (p<0.05).

Results: Mean survival time was 2.7 -year (95%CI: 0.75-0.87). Restoration survival reached 82.5% up to 3-year evaluation, with an overall annual failure rate of 6.2%. The unadjusted model showed restorations performed in children with dmf-t greater than 10 had more restoration failure risk (HR 5.59, 95% CI 1.03-30.34; p= 0.04) However, this association lost significance in the adjusted analysis (p=0.08).

Conclusions: Composite resin restorations in primary teeth presented satisfactory survival after 3-year follow-up

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515573272

2. Boeira GF, Correa MB, Peres KG, Peres MA, Santos IS, Matijasevich A, et al. Caries is the main cause for dental pain in childhood: findings from a birth cohort. Caries Res. 2012;46(5):488-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000339491

3. Torriani DD, Ferro RL, Bonow ML, Santos IS, Matijasevich A, Barros AJ, et al. Dental caries is associated with dental fear in childhood: findings from a birth cohort study. Caries Res. 2014;48(4):263-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000356306

4. Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, Leal SC, Gordan VV, Eden E. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group. Int Dent J. 2012;62(5):223-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12007

5. Dhar V, Hsu KL, Coll JA, Ginsberg E, Ball BM, Chhibber S, et al. Evidence-based update of pediatric dental restorative procedures: dental materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(4):303-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.303

6. Franzon R, Opdam NJ, Guimarães LF, Demarco FF, Casagrande L, Haas AN, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth. J Dent. 2015;43(10):1235-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.011

7. Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Am J Dent. 2013 [access 03/25/2021];26(6):351-5. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24640441/

8. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297

9. Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271

10. Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The simplified oral hygiene index. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964;68(2):7-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0034

11. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent. 2015 [access 24/04/2021];37(2):163-70. Available at: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aapd/pd/2015/00000037/00000002/art00011;jsessionid=7jhqi95f1jr2o.x-ic-live-02

12. Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(8):1110-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0336

13. Donly KJ. Restorative dentistry for children. Dent Clin North Am. 2013;57(1):75-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2012.09.001

14. Schmalz JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(4):215-32. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z

15. Bücher K, Tautz A, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Longevity of composite restorations in patients with early childhood caries (ECC). Clin Oral Investig. 2014 [access 03/25/2021];18(3):775-782. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-013-1043-y

16. Pedrotti D, Ribeiro JF, Weber Pires C, de Oliveira Rocha R, Ardenghi TM, Soares FZM, et al. Survival and associated risk factors of resin-based composite restorations in primary teeth: a clinical, retrospective, university-based study. Pediatr Dent. 2017 [access 03/25/2021];39(4):313-8. Available at: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aapd/pd/2017/00000039/00000004/art00013;jsessionid=d25illd2blr0f.x-ic-live-02

17. Martini D, Sala C, Ferreira G, Britto M, Garcia-Godoy F, Borba F, et al. Patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the longevity of primary teeth restorations in high caries-risk children: a university-based retrospective study. Am J Dent. 2018 [access 03/25/2021];31(5):261-6. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30346673/

18. Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, et al. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28(2):123-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12346

19. van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Cenci MS. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res. 2013;92(7Suppl):S78- S83. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513484337

20. Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87-101. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003

21. Broadbent JM, Thomson WM, Boyens JV, Poulton R. Dental plaque and oral health during the first 32 years of life. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 [access 03/25/2021];142(4):415-26. Available at: https://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(14)62245-5/pdf

22. Ricketts D, Innes N, Schwendicke F. Selective removal of carious tissue. Monogr Oral Sci. 2018;27:82-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000487838

23. Franzon R, Guimarães LF, Magalhães CE, Haas AN, Araujo FB. Outcomes of one-step incomplete and complete excavation in primary teeth: a 24-month randomized controlled trial. Caries Res. 2014;48:376-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000357628

Downloads

Published

2023-01-27

How to Cite

1.
Rojas S, Echeverria S, Oliva J, Fernández E, Chaple Gil AM, Tala MJ, et al. Performance of resin composite restorations placed in high caries risk children: a clinical retrospective study. Rev Cubana Inv Bioméd [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 27 [cited 2025 Jul. 27];42(1). Available from: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/1863

Issue

Vol. 42 (2023)

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

License

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes: Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).

Como Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas forma parte de la red SciELO, una vez los artículos sean aceptados para entrar al proceso editorial (revisión), estos pueden ser depositados por parte de los autores, si estan de acuerdo, en SciELO preprints, siendo actualizados por los autores al concluir el proceso de revisión y las pruebas de maquetación.