Acoustic speech parameters, P300 and adolescent suicidal behavior
Keywords:
suicide, biomarkers, P300, voice, speech.Abstract
Introduction: Suicide results in the second leading cause of death among young people. Suicidal behavior constitutes a study opportunity to prevent death.
Aim: To explore in the literature whether acoustic parameters and bioelectrical activity can be considered biomarkers of suicidal risk.
Methods: A search was performed in the main databases and information managers (PubMed, WOS, IEEExplore, Scopus, Chrocrane). Articles on the relationship between voice, speech, bioelectrical activity and suicidal behavior were selected.
Results: Through the review it was observed that voice and speech provide information about suicidal behavior. Parameters such as: 1) F0; 2) F1; 3) F2 4) F3 and 5) Jitter are highlighted. As for the P300, it varies in latency and amplitude when there is suicidal behavior. However, the interpretation must be careful, because depending on the type of behavior these elements are modified.
Conclusions: Voice, speech and bioelectrical activity could represent biomarkers of suicidal risk; therefore, investigating them would open new windows of action in this area.
Downloads
References
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Prevención del suicidio. WHO; 2016 [acceso 28/07/2020]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/es/temas/prevencion-suicidio
2. Klomek AB. Suicide prevention during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(5):390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30142-5
3. Bachmann S. Epidemiology of suicide and the psychiatric perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071425
4. O’Connor RC, Nock MK. The psychology of suicidal behavior. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(1):73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(14)70222-6
5. Ventura RD, Carvajal C, Undurraga S, Vicuña P, Egaña J, Garib MJ. Prevalencia de ideación e intento suicida en adolescentes de la Región Metropolitana de Santiago de Chile. Rev Med Chile. 2010;138:309-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872010000300008
6. Chu C, Buchman JM, Stanley IH, Hom MA, Tucker RP, Hagan CR, et al. The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(12):1313-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000123
7. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Borges G, Nock M, Wang PS. Trends in suicide ideation, plans, gestures, and attempts in the United States, 1990-1992 to 2001-2003. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2487-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.20.2487
8. Figueroa C, Otzen T, Alarcón C, Ríos A, Frugone D, Lagos R. Association between suicidal ideation and acoustic parameters of university students’ voice and speech: a pilot study. Logop Phoniatr Vocol. 2020;46(2):55-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2020.1733075
9. Cummins N, Scherer S, Krajewski J, Schnieder S, Epps J, Quatieri TF. A review of depression and suicide risk assessment using speech analysis. Speech Commun. 2015;71:10-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2015.03.004
10. Graßnickel V, Illes F, Juckel G, Uhl I. Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) in clinical monitoring of suicidal patients with major depression in comparison with non-suicidal depressed patients and healthy volunteers: A follow-up-study. J Affect Disord. 2015;184:299-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.007
11. Vicente B, Saldivia S, Pihán R. Prevalencias y brechas hoy: salud mental mañana. Acta Bioeth. 2016;22(1):51-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2016000100006
12. Organización mundial de la salud (OMS). Suicidio. OMS; 2018. [acceso 28/07/2020]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide
13. Fazel S, Runeson B. Suicide. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(3):266-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1902944
14. De la Cruz E. Association between FKBP5 and CRHR1 genes with suicidal behavior: A systematic review. Behav Brain Res. 2017;317:46-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.032
15. Parade SH, Huffhines L, Daniels TE, Stroud LR, Nugent NR, Tyrka AR. A systematic review of childhood maltreatment and DNA methylation: candidate gene and epigenome-wide approaches. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01207-y
16. Guintivano J, Brown T, Newcomer A, Jones M, Cox O, Maher BS, et al. Identification and replication of a combined epigenetic and genetic biomarker predicting suicide and suicidal behaviors. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(12):1287-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14010008
17. Roy B, Shelton RC, Dwivedi Y. DNA methylation and expression of stress related genes in PBMC of MDD patients with and without serious suicidal ideation. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;89:115-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.02.005
18. Roy A, Hodgkinson CA, DeLuca V, Goldman D, Enoch MA. Two HPA axis genes, CRHBP and FKBP5, interact with childhood trauma to increase the risk for suicidal behavior. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46(1):72-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.009
19. Turecki G, Brent DA. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. Lancet. 2016;387(10024):1227-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00234-2
20. Sullivan GM, Oquendo MA, Milak M, Miller JM, Burke A, Ogden RT, et al. Positron emission tomography quantification of serotonin 1A receptor binding in suicide attempters with major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(2):169-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2406
21. Sudol K, Mann JJ. Biomarkers of suicide attempt behavior: towards a biological model of risk. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(6):31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0781-y
22. Black C, Miller BJ. Meta-analysis of cytokines and chemokines in suicidality: Distinguishing suicidal versus nonsuicidal patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78(1):28-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.014
23. Pettit JW, Buitron V, Green KL. Assessment and management of suicide risk in children and adolescents. Cogn Behav Pract. 2018;25(4):460-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.04.001
24. Osváth P, Fekete S, Vörös V. Suicide risk assessment and suicide-specific syndromes. Psych Hung. 2020 [acceso 28/07/2020];35(2):126-35. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32191218/
25. Chan MKY, Bhatti H, Meader N, Stockton S, Evans J, O’Connor RC, et al. Predicting suicide following self-harm: Systematic review of risk factors and risk scales. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(4):277-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.170050
26. Fowler JC. Suicide risk assessment in clinical practice: Pragmatic guidelines for imperfect assessments. Psychother. 2012;49(1):81-90. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0026148
27. Roush JF, Brown SL, Jahn DR, Mitchell SM, Taylor NJ, Quinnett P, et al. Mental health professionals’ suicide risk assessment and management practices: The impact of fear of suicide-related outcomes and comfort working with suicidal individuals. Crisis. 2018;39(1):55-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000478
28. Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, Van Heeringen K, Arensman E, Sarchiapone M, et al. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(7):646-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30030-x
29. Van Puyvelde M, Neyt X, McGlone F, Pattyn N. Voice stress analysis: a new framework for voice and effort in human performance. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01994
30. Zhang Z. Mechanics of human voice production and control. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016;140(4):2614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4964509
31. Cannizzaro M, Harel B, Reilly N, Chappell P, Snyder PJ. Voice acoustical measurement of the severity of major depression. Brain Cogn. 2004;56(1):30-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.05.003
32. Sanei S, Chambers JA. EEG Signal Processing. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013.
33. Katz J, Chasin M, English KM, Hood LJ, Tillery KL. Handbook of clinical audiology. Filadelfia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.
34. Lamas A, López J, Sancho L, Mencía S, Borrego R, Carrillo A. Potenciales evocados auditivos de latencia media en el niño críticamente enfermo: Estudio preliminar. An Pediatr. 2006;64(4):354-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1157/13086524
35. Bruno RS, Garcia MV, Silva TFF da, Oppitz SJ, Didoné DD, Santos SN dos, et al. Auditory evoked potential P300 in adults: reference values. Einstein (São Paulo). 2016;14(2):208-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082016ao3586
36. Polich J, Criado JR. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;60(2):172-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.012
37. Kruiper C, Fagerlund B, Nielsen MO, Düring S, Jensen MH, Ebdrup BH, et al. Associations between P3a and P3b amplitudes and cognition in antipsychotic-naïve first-episode schizophrenia patients. Psychol Med. 2019;49(5):868-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291718001575
38. Gupta S, Prasad A, Singh R, Gupta G. Auditory and visual P300 responses in early cognitive assessment of children and adolescents with epilepsy. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2020;15(1):9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103%2FJPN.JPN_21_19
39. Helfrich RF, Knight RT. Chapter 36-Cognitive neurophysiology: Event-related potentials. Handb Clin Neuro. 2019;160:543-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00036-9
40. Fang C, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Fang Q. P300 measures and drive-related risks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155266
41. d’Ardhuy XL, Boeijinga PH, Renault B, Luthringer R, Rinaudo G, Soufflet L, et al. Effects of serotonin-selective and classical antidepressants on the auditory P300 cognitive potential. Neuropsychobiology. 1999;40(4):207-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000026621
42. Ito J, Yamao S, Fukuda H, Mimori Y, Nakamura S. The P300 event-related potentials in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Correlations between P300 and monoamine metabolites. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;77(3):174.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(90)90035-c
43. Baik SY, Jeong M, Kim HS, Lee SH. ERP investigation of attentional disengagement from suicide-relevant information in patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:357-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.046
44. Chen TJ, Yu YW, Chen MC, Wang SY, Tsai SJ, Lee TW. Serotonin dysfunction and suicide attempts in major depressives: an auditory event-related potential study. Neuropsychobiology. 2005;52(1):28-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000086175
45. Attou A, Figiel C, Timsit-Berthier M. Opioid addiction: P300 assessment in treatment by methadone substitution. Neurophysiol Clin. 2001;31(3):171-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0987-7053(01)00253-2
46. McHugh CM, Chun Lee RS, Hermens DF, Corderoy A, Large M, Hickie IB. Impulsivity in the self-harm and suicidal behavior of young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;116:51-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.012
47. Zanatta A, Devicari C, Onzi V, Ranzan J, Dos Santos R, Sleifer P. Central auditory processing: behavioral and electrophysiological assessment of children and adolescents diagnosed with stroke. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;87(5):512-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.10.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes: Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Como Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas forma parte de la red SciELO, una vez los artículos sean aceptados para entrar al proceso editorial (revisión), estos pueden ser depositados por parte de los autores, si estan de acuerdo, en SciELO preprints, siendo actualizados por los autores al concluir el proceso de revisión y las pruebas de maquetación.