Original
Effects of physical charges on uric acid, creatinine and urea in college athletes
Efectos de las cargas físicas sobre el ácido úrico, creatinina y urea en deportistas universitarios
Jaime
Patricio Chávez Hernández1*
José
Alfredo Sánchez Anilema1
Danilo Ortiz
Fernández1
Iván
Giovanny Bonifaz Arias1
Dennys Germán
Palacios Valdiviezo1
Rodrigo Roberto
Santillán Obregón1
1Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo. Ecuador.
*Author for correspondence. E-mail: jaimepatricio33@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Metabolic indicators are biochemical markers that help to identify the health
effects or not of physical stimulus, helping to make decisions related to directing
specific sports training process and educational process in general.
Objective:
To analyze values of renal profile (uric acid, creatinine and urea) in athletes
of the Centro de Educación Física de la Escuela Superior Politécnica
del Chimborazo (ESPOCH).
Methods:
A representative sample (99 subjects, both sexes) of university athletes was
studied, studying some renal indicators (uric acid, creatinine and urea) of
interest to determine the assimilation levels in physical load.
Results:
The average value obtained in uric acid was 4.2 mg/dL (Normal Level), the average
value in creatinine of 0.6 mg/dL, with 10 subjects qualified qualitatively with
a Low level (9.09%) and the rest with a qualitative qualification of Normal
level, while the average value in urea was of 25.9 mg/dl (Normal Level). The
linear correlations established between the three metabolic variables studied
showed a weak positive influence.
Conclusions:
The indicators obtained show a correct adaptation to physical load in university
athletes under study, except for some particularities to be taken into account.
Keywords: uric acid, creatinine, urea, university students.
RESUMEN
Introducción:
Los indicadores metabólicos son marcadores bioquímicos que ayudan
a identificar los efectos saludables o no del estímulo físico, ayudando
a la toma de decisiones relacionadas con el proceso de dirección del entrenamiento
deportivo en específico y el proceso docente-educativo en general.
Objetivo:
Analizar valores del perfil renal (ácido úrico, creatinina
y urea) en deportistas del Centro de Educación Física de la Escuela
Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo (ESPOCH).
Métodos: Se estudió una muestra representativa (99 sujetos,
ambos sexos) de deportistas universitarios, estudiando algunos indicadores renales
(ácido úrico, creatinina y urea) de interés para determinar los
niveles de asimilación de la carga física.
Resultados:
El valor promedio obtenido en ácido úrico fue de 4,2 mg/dL
(Nivel Normal), el valor promedio en creatinina de 0,6 mg/dL, con 10 sujetos
calificados cualitativamente con un nivel Bajo (9,09 %) y el resto con una calificación
cualitativa de nivel Normal, mientras que el valor promedio en urea fue de 25,9
mg/dl (Nivel Normal). Las correlaciones lineales establecidas entre las tres
variables metabólicas señaladas evidenciaron una influencia positiva
débil.
Conclusiones:
Los indicadores obtenidos demuestran una adaptación correcta a la carga
física en los deportistas universitarios sometidos a estudio, salvo algunas
particularidades a tener en cuenta.
Palabras clave: ácido úrico, creatinina, urea, estudiantes universitarios.
INTRODUCTION
In athletes who perform intense physical exercise, a metabolic acidosis originates,1-3 the clinical disorder is characterized by a decrease in blood pressure and the concentration of HC03 accompanied by a compensatory hyperventilation that results in a fall in pC02; occurring in two ways: by acid addition or by the HC0 3 loss.
The main causes of lactic acid increase in come from excess physical work,4-6 exceeding the tolerance limits, either by using too intense loads, by prolonging the training time or by rest lack, by not respecting the adequate rest periods, and even for inadequate nutrition and hydration.5-7
The excessive and continuous release of lactate could generate a metabolic acidosis, considered as an excessive accumulation of lactic acid in anaerobic conditions, because the body tries to transform energy in aerobic conditions when it is insufficient, the body replenishes energy through of lactic acid formation, whose excessive accumulation can generate muscular fatigue that will impede physical activity.8,9 In programmed training, a large amount of pyruvic acid is produced under anaerobic conditions (oxygen absence), in order to maintain muscle contraction, the greatest part of this acid is transformed into lactic acid.10
The determination of Urea levels, Uric Acid and Creatinine (nitrogen metabolites) as part of intervention processes with controlled physical stimuli, is a substantial part of management process in high-performance sports training,11-13 and to determine diverse conditions.14,15 In the case of specialized sports training, pre- and post-training studies are carried out, determining whether the physical effort exceeds the established limits,4 as it could be affectation to kidney when there is a greater blood filtration, as well as proteinuria and haematuria due only to physical exertion, which is eliminated in 24 to 48 hours, if it persists, it is considered a pathological process that would induce self-regulation in the application of physical stimulation and even prophylactic medication.
At the Centro de Educación Física de la Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), students who perform their sporting activities have the possibility of presenting muscle aches that can lead to more severe pathologies such as overtraining and various injuries,16-18 given that a significant percentage of students have not been high performance athletes, and therefore do not have a bioadaptation to prolonged or brief effort, aspect required to fulfill some university teaching requirements as part of career curriculum in Physical activity.
Under these questions, it is useful to control the physical loading effect on athletes of the ESPOCH, so it is evident as investigation purpose to analyze values of renal profile, such as uric acid, creatinine and the urea level in athletes of the Centro de Educación Física de la Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo.
METHODS
For the socialization of research, the link was made between teachers of the Physical Education Center and selected athletes from the different sports disciplines of ESPOCH (Athletics, Ecuavoley, Soccer, Gymnastics, Tennis, Taekwondo and Volleyball), 99 students of both sexes attended freely, and this value is a representative sample of studied population. The reagents used in the investigation will be:
- Reagent for
UREA determination
- RGT1 Reagent 1; Phosphate buffer (pH 7); Sodium salicylate; Nitro prussiate sodium; EDTA; RGT2 Reagent 2; Phosphate buffer (pH <13); Hypochlorite; ENZ Enzyme; Urease; STD Pattern; Urea; Equivalent to BUN; Sodium azide
- Reagent for
determination of Uric Acid HUMAN
- RGT Enzymatic reagent; Phosphate buffer (pH 7.5); 4-aminophenazone; DCHBS; Uricasa; Peroxidase; STD Pattern; Uric Acid and Sodium Azide.
- Reagent for
determination of Creatinina Human.
-
PIC; NaOH; STD
-
The data collection was performed during 2 consecutive weeks from 06:30 to 09:00 in facilities of the Physical Education Center. The renal profile analysis was performed in the Clinical Laboratory of ESPOCH Sciences Faculty before starting the usual training session for each athlete. Linear parametric (Pearson) and nonparametric (Spearman) correlations were applied according to normality distribution obtained with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the reference values of 99 students studied for the variable "uric acid", obtaining a maximum value of 6.9mg/dL and a minimum value of 2.4mg/dL, for an average of 4,2mg/dL, indicating a qualitative rating of Normal in all cases studied.
Table 1. Determination of average uric acid reference values before starting the class sesión
No |
URIC ACID |
|
BEFORE |
REFERENCE VALUE |
|
1 |
4,1 |
NORMAL |
2 |
4,3 |
NORMAL |
3 |
2,9 |
NORMAL |
4 |
4,1 |
NORMAL |
5 |
4,3 |
NORMAL |
6 |
4,3 |
NORMAL |
7 |
5,9 |
NORMAL |
8 |
3 |
NORMAL |
9 |
5,4 |
NORMAL |
10 |
6,2 |
NORMAL |
11 |
4,7 |
NORMAL |
12 |
6,4 |
NORMAL |
13 |
5,1 |
NORMAL |
14 |
3,7 |
NORMAL |
15 |
3,7 |
NORMAL |
16 |
3,3 |
NORMAL |
17 |
4,5 |
NORMAL |
18 |
4,6 |
NORMAL |
19 |
2,8 |
NORMAL |
20 |
2,4 |
NORMAL |
21 |
3,9 |
NORMAL |
22 |
4,1 |
NORMAL |
23 |
3,5 |
NORMAL |
24 |
6,2 |
NORMAL |
25 |
4,8 |
NORMAL |
26 |
6,6 |
NORMAL |
27 |
3 |
NORMAL |
28 |
4,6 |
NORMAL |
29 |
4,6 |
NORMAL |
30 |
3,7 |
NORMAL |
31 |
3,2 |
NORMAL |
32 |
3 |
NORMAL |
33 |
3,4 |
NORMAL |
34 |
5,2 |
NORMAL |
35 |
4,9 |
NORMAL |
36 |
5,8 |
NORMAL |
37 |
3,6 |
NORMAL |
38 |
4,6 |
NORMAL |
39 |
3,7 |
NORMAL |
40 |
3,8 |
NORMAL |
41 |
3 |
NORMAL |
42 |
4,2 |
NORMAL |
43 |
3,3 |
NORMAL |
44 |
4 |
NORMAL |
45 |
6,1 |
NORMAL |
46 |
4,2 |
NORMAL |
47 |
3,9 |
NORMAL |
48 |
3,8 |
NORMAL |
49 |
2,8 |
NORMAL |
50 |
4,4 |
NORMAL |
51 |
2,5 |
NORMAL |
52 |
4,2 |
NORMAL |
53 |
2,6 |
NORMAL |
54 |
3,1 |
NORMAL |
55 |
4,9 |
NORMAL |
56 |
2,7 |
NORMAL |
57 |
2,5 |
NORMAL |
58 |
2,4 |
NORMAL |
59 |
2,6 |
NORMAL |
60 |
4,6 |
NORMAL |
61 |
5,6 |
NORMAL |
62 |
5,6 |
NORMAL |
63 |
6,4 |
NORMAL |
64 |
5,5 |
NORMAL |
65 |
3,9 |
NORMAL |
66 |
2,6 |
NORMAL |
67 |
2,7 |
NORMAL |
68 |
4,9 |
NORMAL |
69 |
3,5 |
NORMAL |
70 |
6,2 |
NORMAL |
71 |
5,1 |
NORMAL |
72 |
4,8 |
NORMAL |
73 |
5,5 |
NORMAL |
74 |
5,5 |
NORMAL |
75 |
6,8 |
NORMAL |
76 |
2,9 |
NORMAL |
77 |
2,4 |
NORMAL |
78 |
6,7 |
NORMAL |
79 |
4,3 |
NORMAL |
80 |
3,1 |
NORMAL |
81 |
3,3 |
NORMAL |
82 |
4,4 |
NORMAL |
83 |
4 |
NORMAL |
84 |
3,7 |
NORMAL |
85 |
4,6 |
NORMAL |
86 |
4,4 |
NORMAL |
87 |
3 |
NORMAL |
88 |
2,7 |
NORMAL |
89 |
5,5 |
NORMAL |
90 |
6,9 |
NORMAL |
91 |
4,3 |
NORMAL |
92 |
3,3 |
NORMAL |
93 |
2,8 |
NORMAL |
94 |
5,6 |
NORMAL |
95 |
6,8 |
NORMAL |
96 |
4,1 |
NORMAL |
97 |
3,6 |
NORMAL |
98 |
5,7 |
NORMAL |
99 |
3,1 |
NORMAL |
Average |
4,2 |
NORMAL |
Mín. |
2,4 |
|
Máx. |
6,9 |
|
Table 2 shows the individual values obtained in the variable creatinine, where the maximum value was established at 1.1mg/dL, the minimum value at 0.4mg/dL, with an average of 0.6 mg/dL. Of the total sample studied, 10 subjects were qualitatively qualified with a Low level (9.09%), and the rest of the subjects studied obtained a Normal qualitative rating.
Table 2. Determination of reference values of average creatinine before starting the class sesión
No |
CREATININE |
|
BEFORE |
REFERENCE VALUE |
|
1 |
1 |
NORMAL |
2 |
0,9 |
NORMAL |
3 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
4 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
5 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
6 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
7 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
8 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
9 |
0,9 |
NORMAL |
10 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
11 |
0,4 |
LOW |
12 |
0,9 |
NORMAL |
13 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
14 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
15 |
0,8 |
NORMAL |
16 |
1 |
NORMAL |
17 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
18 |
0,4 |
LOW |
19 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
20 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
21 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
22 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
23 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
24 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
25 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
26 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
27 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
28 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
29 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
30 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
31 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
32 |
0,8 |
NORMAL |
33 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
34 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
35 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
36 |
0,8 |
NORMAL |
37 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
38 |
0,8 |
NORMAL |
39 |
0,8 |
NORMAL |
40 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
41 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
42 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
43 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
44 |
0,9 |
NORMAL |
45 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
46 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
47 |
0,8 |
NORMAL |
48 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
49 |
0,4 |
LOW |
50 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
51 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
52 |
0,9 |
NORMAL |
53 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
54 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
55 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
56 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
57 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
58 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
59 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
60 |
0,7 |
NORMAL |
61 |
0,4 |
LOW |
62 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
63 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
64 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
65 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
66 |
0,4 |
LOW |
67 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
68 |
0,7 |
NORMAL |
69 |
0,8 |
NORMAL |
70 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
71 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
72 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
73 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
74 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
75 |
0,9 |
NORMAL |
76 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
77 |
0,4 |
LOW |
78 |
0,7 |
NORMAL |
79 |
1 |
NORMAL |
80 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
81 |
0,4 |
LOW |
82 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
83 |
0,4 |
LOW |
84 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
85 |
0,7 |
NORMAL |
86 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
87 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
88 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
89 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
90 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
91 |
0,4 |
LOW |
92 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
93 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
94 |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
95 |
1,1 |
NORMAL |
96 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
97 |
0,7 |
NORMAL |
98 |
0,4 |
LOW |
99 |
0,5 |
NORMAL |
Average |
0,6 |
NORMAL |
Mín. |
0,4 |
|
Máx. |
1,1 |
|
Table 3 shows the individual data obtained as part of urea variable, obtaining a maximum value of 45.8 mg/dl and a minimum value of 14.6mg/dl, for an average or 25.9mg/dl. All the studied sample obtained a qualitative qualification in normal urea levels, coinciding with the indicators obtained in uric acid.
Table 3. Determination of reference values of average urea before starting the class sesión
No |
UREA |
|
BEFORE |
REFERENCE VALUE |
|
1 |
16,3 |
NORMAL |
2 |
22,1 |
NORMAL |
3 |
21,6 |
NORMAL |
4 |
15,4 |
NORMAL |
5 |
39,9 |
NORMAL |
6 |
22,9 |
NORMAL |
7 |
26,1 |
NORMAL |
8 |
14,6 |
NORMAL |
9 |
33,7 |
NORMAL |
10 |
33,3 |
NORMAL |
11 |
45,8 |
NORMAL |
12 |
32,1 |
NORMAL |
13 |
24,8 |
NORMAL |
14 |
24,2 |
NORMAL |
15 |
23,7 |
NORMAL |
16 |
32,1 |
NORMAL |
17 |
27,7 |
NORMAL |
18 |
25,7 |
NORMAL |
19 |
24,4 |
NORMAL |
20 |
20,9 |
NORMAL |
21 |
30,6 |
NORMAL |
22 |
24,1 |
NORMAL |
23 |
28,4 |
NORMAL |
24 |
18,5 |
NORMAL |
25 |
29,5 |
NORMAL |
26 |
24,5 |
NORMAL |
27 |
28,2 |
NORMAL |
28 |
22,2 |
NORMAL |
29 |
26,8 |
NORMAL |
30 |
33,4 |
NORMAL |
31 |
27,5 |
NORMAL |
32 |
26,5 |
NORMAL |
33 |
20,6 |
NORMAL |
34 |
20,8 |
NORMAL |
35 |
22,8 |
NORMAL |
36 |
23,5 |
NORMAL |
37 |
26,7 |
NORMAL |
38 |
29,6 |
NORMAL |
39 |
21,3 |
NORMAL |
40 |
22,2 |
NORMAL |
41 |
19,7 |
NORMAL |
42 |
20,2 |
NORMAL |
43 |
21,6 |
NORMAL |
44 |
34,2 |
NORMAL |
45 |
20,3 |
NORMAL |
46 |
26,1 |
NORMAL |
47 |
22,1 |
NORMAL |
48 |
27,8 |
NORMAL |
49 |
25,2 |
NORMAL |
50 |
21,5 |
NORMAL |
51 |
22,2 |
NORMAL |
52 |
23,6 |
NORMAL |
53 |
16,8 |
NORMAL |
54 |
19,5 |
NORMAL |
55 |
27,9 |
NORMAL |
56 |
25,3 |
NORMAL |
57 |
30,7 |
NORMAL |
58 |
18,7 |
NORMAL |
59 |
20 |
NORMAL |
60 |
45,6 |
NORMAL |
61 |
19,1 |
NORMAL |
62 |
28,6 |
NORMAL |
63 |
39,3 |
NORMAL |
64 |
28,9 |
NORMAL |
65 |
27,2 |
NORMAL |
66 |
41,6 |
NORMAL |
67 |
23,9 |
NORMAL |
68 |
27,7 |
NORMAL |
69 |
31,5 |
NORMAL |
70 |
25,1 |
NORMAL |
71 |
31,7 |
NORMAL |
72 |
27 |
NORMAL |
73 |
28,1 |
NORMAL |
74 |
38,3 |
NORMAL |
75 |
34,3 |
NORMAL |
76 |
22,6 |
NORMAL |
77 |
24,3 |
NORMAL |
78 |
30,3 |
NORMAL |
79 |
18,2 |
NORMAL |
80 |
18,4 |
NORMAL |
81 |
24,8 |
NORMAL |
82 |
20,9 |
NORMAL |
83 |
21,7 |
NORMAL |
84 |
29 |
NORMAL |
85 |
18,6 |
NORMAL |
86 |
30 |
NORMAL |
87 |
18,4 |
NORMAL |
88 |
20,5 |
NORMAL |
89 |
25,5 |
NORMAL |
90 |
33,4 |
NORMAL |
91 |
23 |
NORMAL |
92 |
21,1 |
NORMAL |
93 |
24,5 |
NORMAL |
94 |
26 |
NORMAL |
95 |
32,2 |
NORMAL |
96 |
26,4 |
NORMAL |
97 |
19,5 |
NORMAL |
98 |
27,9 |
NORMAL |
99 |
26,2 |
NORMAL |
Average |
25,9 |
NORMAL |
Mín. |
14,6 |
|
Máx. |
45,8 |
|
DISCUSSION
In the results analysis, the differences between the sexes must be taken into account, given that many performance indicators differ according to gender.19 For the present case, some scales that determine the qualitative levels vary according to gender, the normal indicators in uric acid level for the female sex are between 3 & 6.5 mg/dL to between 4.5 to 8.2 mg/dL for men,20 while normal creatinine indicators are 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL (61.9 to 114.9 μmol/L) for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL (53 to 97.2 μmol / L) for women.21 On the other hand, the normal blood urea indicators used for both sexes are located at a lower level of 40 mg/dL.22
In another sense, the linear correlations established between uric acid and creatinine showed a bilateral significance of p=0.006, establishing Spearman's Rho in ,275, for a weak positive correlation, while the linear correlation established between uric acid and urea also showed a bilateral significance (p=0.001), for a positive correlation of Pearson in ,320 (weak). On the other hand, the linear correlation between the urea indicator and creatinine indicator did not show significant differences (p = 0.286), nor did it obtain a satisfactory correlation indicator with Spearman's Rho (Weak: ,108). In this sense, it has not been possible to demonstrate solidly the effects of one indicator on another; therefore, the determination of a metabolite of studied ones does not indicate significant positive influences in other metabolites under study.
Although it is useful to determine of uric acid values, creatinine and urea in university athletes as a research objective, it is recommended to extend of research field to other metabolites, including organic responses before, during and after the initiation of a specific training plan, such as and as it is concretized in Vásquez; Riquetti; & Morales4 with lactic acid.
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
From the view point of metabolites uric acid, creatinine and urea, the indicators obtained show a correct adaptation to physical load in the subjects studied, except for some particularities to be taken into account, which according to principle of pedagogical individualization must be differentiated, taking the pertinent actions from the physical education curriculum to avoid overload syndromes and the reduction of athletic and academic performance.
Acknowledgments
To the research project "Valoración del perfil renal y ácido úrico antes, durante y después de la práctica deportiva en los estudiantes del Centro de Educación Física de la Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo".
REFERENCES
1. Robergs RA, Parker DL, Ghiasvand F. Bioquímica de la Acidosis Metabólica Inducida por el Ejercicio. [Online]. 2004 [cited 2018/11/11]. Available from: https://g-se.com/bioquimica-de-la-acidosis-metabolica-inducida-por-el-ejercicio-781-sa-k57cfb2718432f .
2. Robergs RA, Ghiasvand F, Parker D. Biochemistry of exercise-induced metabolic acidosis. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2004;287(3):R502-R516.
3. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Lactic acidosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(24):2309-19.
4. Vásquez VE, Riquetti HA, Morales S. Estudio del ácido láctico en el crossfit: Aplicación en cuatro sesiones de entrenamiento. Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas. 2017;36(3):1-16.
5. Bonen E. Transporte de lactato al corazón y músculo esuqelético. Médica deportiva. 2006;4(32):32.
6. León S, Calero S, Chávez E. Morfología funcional y biomecánica deportiva. 2nd ed. Quito: Editorial de la Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE; 2016.
7. Saínz Menéndez B. Alteraciones del equilibrio acido básico. Revista cubana de cirugía. 2006;45(1):10-38.
8. Cairns SP. Lactic acid and exercise performance. Sports medicine. 2006;36(4):279-91.
9. Facey A, Irving R, Dilworth L. Overview of lactate metabolism and the implications for athletes. Am J Sport Sci Med. 2013;1(3):42-6.
10. MacLaren D, Morton J. Biochemistry for sport and exercise metabolism UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
11. Neumann G, Pfützner A, Berbalk A. Successful Endurance Training Germany: Meyer & Meyer Verlag; 2000.
12. Mauger AR, Hettinga FJ, Micklewright DP, Renfree A, Pageaux B, Jones HS, et al. Regulation of Endurance Performance: New Frontiers US: Frontiers Media SA; 2017.
13. do Nascimento Lima JT, Barros FL, de Almeida Mourão R, da Silva Teixeira AC, de Sousa AM, Costa MC, et al. Duplo produto como parâmetro de prescrição de exercícios e como preditor do consumo de oxigênio. Lecturas: Educación Física y Deportes. 2018;22(236):67-71.
14. Álvarez Ponce VA, Rodríguez Baquero M, Pardo Mederos JM, Rodríguez Llobera A. El ácido úrico como factor predictor de la preeclampsia. Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2018;44(2):1-9.
15. Bencomo Rodríguez O. Enfermedad Renal Crónica: prevenirla, mejor que tratarla. Revista Cubana de Medicina General Integral. 2015;31(3):1-8.
16. Martínez Estupiñán L. Lesiones deportivas en niños atletas. Estudio de veinte años. MediSur. 2017;15(6):819-25.
17. Kreher JB. Diagnosis and prevention of overtraining syndrome: an opinion on education strategies. Open access journal of sports medicine. 2016;7:115.
18. Mena FM, Morales S. Estudio de las lesiones más comunes en el rugby ecuatoriano, categoría senior. Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas. 2018;37(4):1-12.
19. Flores Abad E, Arancibia Cid C, Calero Morales S. Análisis y medición antropométrica en la detección de posibles talentos deportivos, en niños/as y adolescentes ecuatorianos Guayaquil: Universidad de Guayaquil, Oficina de Proyectos Rentables. Proyecto MINDE-UG; 2014.
20. Bennington JL. Diccionario enciclopédico del laboratorio clínico Madrid: Ed. Médica Panamericana; 2000.
21. Medline. Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los EE. UU. 2017 [cited 2018/6/23]. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/spanish/ency/article/003475.htm .
22. Rioja Salud. Interpretando los análisis del riñón. 2017 [cited 2018/7/03]. Available from: https://www.riojasalud.es/ciudadanos/catalogo-multimedia/nefrologia/interpretando-los-analisis-del-rinon .
Interest conflict declaration
The authors declare that they do not have any type of interests conflict.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.